Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect. In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do? 1. Interrupt and correct the mistake right away 2. Wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leader 3. Say nothing
Undoubtably, humans, as the epitome of social creatures, have been endeavoring to show respect to their kind and make this thing for themselves a goal. So, individuals attempt to reach this goal by a variety of means. Now, one of the prevalent topics which is undergoing serious debate is what people’s behavior should be in the case when someone has a presentation and makes a mistake in it. From my point of view, if someone makes a mistake in the presentation, others should wait until the presentation is over. The first benefit of raising a concern or issue about the presentation after the meeting is that some professors or leaders have a strategy for it and make an effort to manage their time so that they can cover all they want to. As a result, they could become distracted or lose their train of thought if someone questions them or makes a comment about their presentation. Additionally, people need to learn to respect other people's rights, including those related to time, talking, and other things. Respecting other people's presentations, then, has certain positive effects on society and raises people's regard for one another. For instance, at a lecture he gave at my university a few years ago, one of the greatest physics professors ever scribbled one of the formulas incorrectly. I approached the lecturer after the presentation and remarked, "You made a mistake when you wrote the formula." He was grateful to me that I never interrupted his speech. As a result, the best method to respect audiences and presenters is to make a point or ask a question after each presentation. The second, and equally important, argument is that by bringing up the speaker's errors after the presentation, it provides them the chance to fix them more effectively and will result in better preparation materials for the presentation. The speakers may also update their knowledge as a result of this employment, giving the best presentation possible to the audience. Assume that throughout the discussion, everyone raises a point regarding the presentation materials. No one else can learn anything from the gathering since the anarchy has taken over. For instance, my brother recounts a tale about one of the most significant businesspeople in our nation's era. According to him, the presenter made a mistake during the presentation regarding the currency of one of the other countries. My brother claims that after the presentation, he went to see the presenter and informed him of the error and how it forced him to update his knowledge of the currencies of the other countries. Making a point after each gathering could thereby increase the presenter's knowledge. For the above reasons, making a point or asking a question after each kind of gathering is more beneficial than doing this during the presentation because of respect to the presenter and the presenter's ability to accumulate more knowledge.
Submitted by muhammadha93 on