When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e-mail, they will produce better work for the project.

In today's competitive world, people need to have excellent social skills in order to get good job opportunities with sufficient salaries to provide for their families and fulfill their desires by living prosperously. One of the main qualities that employers are looking after in their employees is to be able to work in groups and communicate with co-workers. In this regard, some people are of the opinion that communicating in person rather than by e-mail yields better results in a project. Personally, I agree with this statement due to various reasons, two of which I'm going to elaborate upon to substantiate my viewpoint in the following essay. To begin with, communicating in person makes it much easier for people to convey their intentions very clearly and avoid misunderstandings or misinterpretations. This is to say, such misinterpretations can easily happen when two people are communicating by e-mail, which can take the project in the wrong direction, wasting their time and energy to fix what has been done wrongly. There is a compelling example of this point. A few months ago, I was forced to work at home due to quarantine imposed due to severe Covid-19 distribution in my country. Hence, I was forced to communicate with my colleagues by e-mail and phone, if necessary. Different parts of the project were done by various people in the company, and they shared their tasks with each other by using e-mail. Once there was a design problem we had confronted that needed to be solved, and my peers started to share their ideas and solutions. However, there were many individuals who had misunderstood the problem entirely and gave solutions irrelevant to the task at hand. As a result, the problem was solved in the wrong way and hurt the project's final outcome. This incident would not have happened if the problem was solved in a normal way, by people talking to each other in the same room. Another worthwhile reason to be mentioned is that communicating by e-mail is too much time-consuming and makes people prone to distractions, which can hurt the project's quality. To be more specific, answering e-mails can take much longer than relating in person and can cause people to get distracted by other incidents happening around them. In addition, the more time is spent on simple, ordinary tasks, the more it can get tedious and frustrating for people, which can reduce their efficiency and innovation. Therefore, people cannot show their best work if they're not entirely focused on their tasks, which indeed can have adverse effects on the project's quality. For instance, many students can study better and do their assignments with better quality when they are in a conducive, non-distracting environment since they can talk to their classmates directly and don't lose their attention. In conclusion, having considered the aforementioned points, I firmly believe that communicating in person instead of by e-mail can improve the projects' quality. This is because not only can people convey their intentions and avoid misinterpretations, but also they can concentrate on their projects and avoid distractions, which can help them to provide better results.