Some people think that human needs for farmland, housing, and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals. Do you agree or disagree with this point of view? Why or why not? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer

some people think that human needs for farmland, housing and indusrty is more impoetant than saving the land of endagfered animals valuing the land more than the life that is there but in my point of view an this is that it's roungh as we have created new methods to do many of these task's better, people of all classes want more land for faring, housing and other things but all that comes at a cost that the endangered animals will have lost a large part of there home not only that but we would also lose a large number of tree's, plants and other life forms that are importent to us those people will say farmland not only provids jobs, food for both us and the animals but destroing the land the these animals is not needed to provid food for us humans and animals as we have already figerd out how build farm land under the graound witch will also provide jobs for the people in the cuse for housing we have the needed amount of not only land to build houses by build on sandy land instad of the land of endangerd animals but also we have many emty home that aren't ocupaid for industry's there are already a lage number of factory's and bulding that have been left industry can just get reid of the factory or bulding there and bulid one on top of it, as we have already lost 60% of many endangered animal land in conclusion i think the we should protcet them.
Submitted by ib on
What to do next: