Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader.
In the modern era, leaders are seen as essential elements in the success of communities. One of the contentious issues in this area has to do with where different people get their leadership qualities from. I fully believe that there are many ways to build one's personality to become a great leader, contrary to the belief of many people who feel that great leaders are chosen by the cosmos to fulfill their destinies. I'll persuasively highlight my most noteworthy arguments to support my viewpoint in the paragraphs that follow. The first step in being a leader is to learn from mistakes. The most effective leaders take lessons from their past mistakes and potential new situations. They actively seek knowledge to keep current in a fast-changing professional environment, perceive obstacles as opportunities rather than threats, and are interested to find out where they can improve and try new approaches. Therefore, those who have experienced a range of difficult circumstances and learned from them will undoubtedly make excellent leaders in the future. Now imagine that someone is given a leadership position in a different method and has never been in a challenging circumstance. Due to their inexperience, they can't possibly lead the people around them. For instance, there have been many great leaders throughout history, including politicians and economists, who all had the ability to learn from their mistakes and use them as stepping stones to success. Learning is therefore a wise way to acquire leadership. The other thing that is fundamental to becoming a leader is that individuals have got to place in competitive areas. Working in a competitive field gives people the first impression that they are trying to impress others, and this kind of conduct drives them to become better people and to learn more information. Therefore, if people are given an environment that encourages them to learn new things, they won't just rely on the things they already know or the methods that have worked in the past; they will actively seek out new information and consider how to apply what they have learned in various ways, depending on the circumstance. For example, when I was a student at the university a couple of years ago, we worked on one of the university's projects in a group setting, and our professor claimed that he chose the leader of the group among us, but this choice depended on our knowledge of the project, so all of us were studying diligently to achieve the place of the leader of the group. Therefore, everyone in leadership should increase their knowledge in order to be in leadership. However, this does not occur unless a spirit of competitiveness is cultivated among the populace. In conclusion, two factors are playing an important role in people's lives in getting a leader; One of them is that people should fail and learn from their mistakes. The other is that they should have a sense of competition in their spirit.
Submitted by muhammadha93 on