Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? For the successful development of a country, it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children (five to ten years old) than to spend money on universities
Since the dawn of civilization, countries' development has always been a subject of criticism. Schools and universities are known as the key factors to any society`s development, so it needs more attention from the government. They are always concerned about which one is better to invest in and has more benefits for the country. People hold different ideas about the importance of schools or universities. Some people believe that financial support in universities has a better result. On the other hand, others say that investment in primary levels of education leads the country to success. As far as I am concerned, spending money on school development is a more logical decision by more governments that I will delve into it in the following essay. To begin with, children are wealth for every country, also youngsters development play a vital role in every successful society. Every single student in the school is the foundation of the country, and if any country spends enough money to improve young children, they will develop their country successfully. For example, Japan is known as one of the most developed countries in the world. I have read a passage about this fantastic achievement that wrote this is because some years after that miserable atomic attract, they invest most of their financial resources in elementary schools` students. Thus, I believe the government men should support youth children to get better consequences. Furthermore, it is easier to reshape a metal when it is hotter. If we let the temperature gown down, it becomes hard to change its shape, so I believe that it is critical to invest in people who are in their first ages of life. In addition, If we train young children between five to ten, they will be more ready for the future and we will not have a problem when they are at the universities. For instance, when I was at school, my education institution spent a lot of money to make our school advance with high technology facilities and equipment, as a result, I learned concepts and lessons in the best way, and now, I do not have a considerable problem in my university, because I am trained well when I was a child. Therefore, I believe that not only it is more flexible to train school children, but also it leads them to be a success in the future. In conclusion, to the best of my knowledge, it is a logical decision to invest in the education of very youth people in the school to lead the country to development. First of all, because children are countries` valuable asset and have a crucial role in every society`s future, second, I believe it is easier and more flexible to train people when they are young enough.
Submitted by mobin_zarreh on