Question :Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.

Undoubtedly, In twenty-century cars play a major role in human life, and People use cars almost daily. Applying diversity in this circumstance requires more time and energy or a breakthrough. So, I believe, In the next twenty years, the number of cars will not diminish. To elaborate on my view, I will explain my reasons in the following essay. To begin with, According to the importance of cars in our life. If it wants to decrease, it will demand a replacement. Twenty years is not enough time to make this change, so in this case,we need a breakthrough or an immediate change. An instance of a breakthrough could be Inventing the machine that helps us to travel in the blink of an eye. As a result, we do not need cars anymore. Because it is faster and more efficient, it could help us to maintain time. Conversely, without having a replacement it will be unfortunate that the number of ars will diminish. Furth more, the population is growing from place to place. The time of updating automation is different. As I indicated before, change, in this case, this case requires a reinstatement. Even If we invent a replacement, It could take more than a century to distribute this machinery all over the world. To make it reasonable, For instance, the 5G technology was initiated and developed more than five years ago, but still, there is lots of community where that do not have access to the internet. This example could illustrate replacing a technology How much take time. To conclude, I indicated two reasons which were somehow related, but they are significantly important. Firstly, diminishing an important technology needs development in the relevant industry. Secondly, even if we build a replacement, Still It needs times more than a century to replace it across the world.
Submitted by Ahmad Javadi on
What to do next: