Summarise the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they case doubt on specific points made in the reading passage.

It is claimed in the reading passage that it is better to provide people into a team as a group to starting a new project. However, the lecturer disagreed with this opinion and stated some reason for it which will be presented in this essay. First, the reading section asserted that a group can work more quickly than an individual because of the number of people who contribute to the team and assignments would be done more creatively than single work. The instructor, by contrast, believed that when a company decides to assemble a group of people into a team, it will take so long for colleagues to reach consensus. Furthermore, colleagues have to have many meetings to be successful in choosing one agreed direction for the project’s policy. Second, the reading passage claimed that in team working individuals have more chance for shining and recognition. in contrast, the professor stated that it would be possible to emerge some free-ride in every groups. They have less contributing in work but if the result their team’s work was remarkable, they would get reward too; nevertheless, there is no certain recognition for persons work in the best manner. Not only is there no chance for shining for each person, but their effort also could disappear in team working. Third, it has been stated in the reading passage that everyone has a voting rate in making decisions and nothing will impose on them. On the contrary, the lecturer asserted that it might be some person who anaged the group influentially and if someone wars about one decision which is selected by the group, they could be ignored by influencers. Finally, the result could be failing or successful but if it failed, the blame will place on all group even individuals who opposed that decision.
Submitted by parniandavoodi on
What to do next: