Summarise the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific theories discussed the reading passage.

In the given set of materials, the reading, and the lecture both deal with people working as a unit. While the author provides three possible theories to explain that squad working can be the best way to approach a new project, the lecturer disputes the claims made in the ext. In particular, his position is that troop of people being responsible for planning a project and getting a reward might be a failure. First of all, according to the passage, a crowd of people has a wide range of knowledge. They can express different and creative ideas. In addition, their brains all together are more agile than one person’s brain. Nevertheless, this specific argument is challenged by the lecturer. He declares that it takes many meetings for a bunch of people to meet an agreement, moreover, he points out that organization members may spend their time arguing about different things. Secondly, the article suggests that participating in a crowd project can be rewarding for every member of the lineup. Therefore, no one will end up upset. The speaker, however, asserts some who work especially hard and contribute a lot more than others, will not get enough recognition. Finally, the writer posits that a lub’s work can have more far-reaching results than an individual alone. In contrast, the professor’s stance is that there are some influencers in the teams, who have a major impact on others. Hence, if their opinion is wrong, it will lead the whole company to fail. As you can see, the listening part casts doubts on the points mentioned in the reading by bringing up its compelling explanation and examples to elaborate its viewpoint.