Some prefer interactive classes; others prefer to listen only what teacher speak. Which one do you prefer? Give details and examples

There is myriad of ways in which learners learn. Some believe that teamwork is much more productive as compared to passively listening to the monotonous lecture of a tutor, some have preference for otherwise. However, I firmly opine that a task involving interactions is worth appreciative as opposed to paying attention to the single speaker. I state this fact basically because of two vital reasons. First, interactive sessions augment our communication skills. Evidently, when children are involved in a cooperative mode of learning, they get better opportunity to share their views to the class. This allows them to enhance their confidence level, use of eye contacts, and familiarize with the use of gestures. Furthermore, pupils are bestowed with the platform to display their language skills which further boost the level of their literacy. Additionally, it is supported by my personal experience. During my childhood day, mode of teaching was lecture-based. Students were scarcely provided with the stage to speak out. That is the reason why, I lack communication skills. If lessons were bidirectional, I would have developed my communication at the greater height. Second, cooperative learning aids in social development. Obviously, this area of development is a thing that cannot be neglected as we grow up. It is one of the crucial aspects of success. When the lesson is interactive, it offers students with an opportunity to connect with different people. This ultimately lead tutees to be much adaptive in any environment in the future. For an instance, I am fit in social setting as I was given opportunity participate in classroom discussion through ample of activities during the high school days. If I was deprived of such opportunities, I would have faced difficulty get along with people. In coclusion, collaborative learning broaden the way we communicate and makes us socially