Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

It is more favorable to work only three days in a week for longer periods than getting a job for the whole week for less working hours. I complete agree with this notion. In fact, many employees may choose this option of working for many more hours in order to have time during a week, also to make their job more efficient. To start with I can state that working half of the week is a proper way to have more free time. It is more convinient for people who strive for getting two or three jobs at the same time. I'd put forward my experience as a vivid example for bolstering my choice. Last summer I used this method of working half a week for one company, and another part for the other one. As a result I got a decent salary from both corporations by spliting my working hours. Furthermore, I believe that concentrating on one specific job for longer hours may be beneficial for many aspects. As a matter of fact, working for more than six hours a day is considered to be the most productive way to finish a certain job. For instance, my father used to work for shorter hours and it made him to forget about his job frequently. For that matter he extended the working hours and it lead to successful results. As a conclusion I can claim that a person should work for longer hours on 3 days in a week instead of shorter periods for more days. According to me this the optimum method to manage your time and have operative results.
Submitted by Hayarpi Gharibyan on
What to do next: